國立暨南國際大學

九、備註Remarks

每周一個主題，每周由下面主題各挑出一篇(或兩篇)進行研讀與討論

References:
 
【A. Theory Building】

1. Bacharach, S. B. 1989. Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14: 496-515.
2. Sutton, R. I. & Staw, B. M. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40: 371-384.
3. Weick, K. (1995) What theory is not, Theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly (40)3: 385-390. 
4. Whetten, D. A. 1989. What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14: 490-495.
5. Pfeffer (1993). Barriers to the development of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18: 599-620.
6. Perrow (1994). Pfeffer Slips! Academy of Management Review, 19: 191-194.
7. Cannella & Paetzold (1994). Pfeffer's barriers to the advance of organizational science: A rejoinder. Academy of Management Review, 19: 331-341.
8. Gruber, M., & Bliese, P. (2024). Expanding AMJ’S Manuscript Portfolio: Research Methods Articles Designed to Advance Theory and Span Boundaries. Academy of Management Journal, 67(1), 1-4.

Questions for Class Discussion:
• What is theory? 
• What types of contribution can grounded theory make relative to other approaches? 

-----
 
【B. The field of OB Research Studies】

1. Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(6), 695-706.
2.Porter, L. 1996. Forty years of organization studies: Reflections from a micro perspective.  Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 262-269.
3. Mowday, R. T., & Sutton, R. I. (1993). Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. In Spence, J. T., Darley, J. M., & Foss, D. J. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, 44: 195-229.
4. O’Reilly, C. A. (1991). Organizational behavior: Where we’ve been, where we’re going. In Spence, J. T., Darley, J. M., & Foss, D. J. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, 42: 427-458.
5. Rousseau, D. M. (1997). Organizational behavior in the new organizational era. In Spence, J. T., Darley, J. M., & Foss, D. J. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, 48: 515-546. 
6. Staw, B. (1984). Organizational behavior: A review and reformulation of the field’s outcome variables. In Spence J. T., Darley J. M., & Foss D. J. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, 35: 627-666.

-----

【C. Meso and Multi-level OB Studies】

1. Cappelli, P., & Sherer, P. (1991). The missing role of context in OB: The need for a meso-level approach. In Staw, B. M, & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 13: 55-110.
2. House, R. J., Rousseau, D.M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. 1995. The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 17: 71-114. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3. Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. In Staw B. M., & Cummings L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 7: 1-37.
4. Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Klein, K.J. (2000).  A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal, and emergent processes.  In K.J. Klein & S.W.J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multi-level theory, research, and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90).  San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Cummings, Staw (1991). The missing role of context in OB: The need for a meso-level approach. Research in Organizational Behaviors, 13: 55-110.
6. Klein, Dansereau and Hall (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19: 195-229.

-----

【D. Individual Difference】

1.  Roberts, B. W. (2006). Personality development and organizational behavior. Research in organizational behavior, 27, 1-40.
2.  Neal, A., Yeo, G., Koy, A., & Xiao, T. (2012). Predicting the form and direction of work role performance from the Big 5 model of personality traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 175-192.
3.  Staw, Bell and Clausen (1986). The dispositional approach to job attitudes: A lifetime test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 56-78.
4.  Davis-Blake and Pfeffer (1989). Just a mirage: The search for dispositional effects in organizational research. Academy of Management review, 14: 385-400.
5.  House, Shane and Herold (1996). Rumors of the death of dispositional research are vastly exaggerated. Academy of Management Review, 21: 203-224.
6.  Bachtiar, N. K., & Ramli, N. H. (2023). Resilience as Bottom-Line Strategy Towards Business Sustainability: a Review. Strategic Management Journal, 6(7), 50.

-----

【E. Commitment and Turnover】

1. Mathieu, J.E., & Zajac, D.M. (1990).  A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment.  Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
2. Brooke, P.P., Russell, D.W., & Price, J.L. (1988).  Discriminant validation of measures of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment.  Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 139-145.
3. Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. 1994. An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Review, 19: 51-89.
4. Lee, T., Mitchell, T.R., Sablynski, C.J., Burton, J.P., & Holtom, B.C. (2004).  The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover.  Academy of Management Journal, 47, 711-722.

-----

【F. Incentives】

1. Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635.
2. Ambrose and Kulik (1999). Old friends, new faces: Motivations research in the 1990s. Journal of management, 25: 231-292.
3. Skinner (1987). Whatever happened to psychology as the science of behavior? American Psychologist, 42: 780-786.
4. Kipnis (1994). Accounting for the use of behavioral technologies in social psychology. American Psychologist, 49: 165-172.
5. Gollwitzer (1999). Implementation intentions. American Psychologist, 54: 493-503.
6. Deci and Ryan (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation-intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55: 68-78.

-----

【G. Oorganizational Citizenship Behavior 】

1. Organ, D.W., & Ryan, K. (1995).  A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior.  Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-802.
2. LePine, J.A., A. Erez. D.E. Johnson. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis.  Journal of Applied Psychology. 87 52-65
3. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bacharach, D. G. (2000).Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513-563.
4. Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 421-444.

-----

【H. Groups】

1. Earley (1989). Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of U.S. and the People’s Republic of China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 565-581.
2. 7-2 Friedman and Gal (1991). Managing around roles: Building groups in labor, negotiations. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 27: 356-378.
3. Williams (2001). In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. Academy of Management Review, 26: 377-396.
4. Liao, Z., Zhang, J. H., Wang, N., Bottom, W. P., Deichmann, D., & Man Tang, P. (2024). The gendered liability of venture novelty. Academy of Management Journal, 67(2), 299-330.

-----

【I. Leadership】
1.  Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2018). The servant leadership advantage: When perceiving low differentiation in leader-member relationship quality influences team cohesion, team task performance and service OCB. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 333-345.
2.  Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. 1997. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 82-111.
3. House, R., Spangler, W., & Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in the U.S. presidency: A psychological theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 364-396.
4. Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Cogliser, C. C. (1999). Leader-Member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 63-113.
5. Shamir, B., Zakay, E., & Pooper, M. (1998).  Correlates of charismatic leadership behavior in military units: Subordinates’ attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors’ appraisals of leader performance.  Academy of Management Journal, 41, 387-409.
6. Wang, Hui, Law, K.S., Hackett, R.D., Wang, D, & Chen, Z. (2005).  Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformation leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior.  Academy of Management Journal, 48, 420-432.
7.	Smircich and Morgan (1982). Leadership: The management of meaning. The Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 18: 257-273.
8.  Meindl (1990). On leadership: An alternative to the conventional wisdom. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 159-203.

-----

【J. Identity, demography and diversity】

1. Davina Vora, Tatiana Kostova, Kendall Roth, Roles of subsidiary managers in multinational corporations: The effect of dual organizational identification. Management International Review, October 2007, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 595-620.
2. forth, B. E., & Mael, F. 1989. Social identity and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14: 20-39.
3. O'Reilly, Charles A., III; Caldwell, David F.; Barnett, William P.  “Work Group Demography, Social Integration, And Turnover”, Administrative Science Quarterly 1989, 34 (1): 21-38. 
4.	Tsui, Anne; Egan, Terri; O’Reilly, Charles, III.  “Being Different:  Relational Demography and Organizational Attachment”, Administrative Science Quarterly 1992, 37 (4): 549-579.
5.	Lau, D. C. & Mumigham, J. K. 2005 Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographics faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 645-
6.	Chang, E. H., & Kirgios, E. L. (2023). Demographic “Stickiness”: The Demographic Identity of Departing Group Members Influences Who Is Chosen to Replace Them. Management Science.

-----

【K. Social Exchange & Justice】

1. Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to employee-organization relationships: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1089-1121.
2. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. 1997. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 82-111.
3. Chen, C. C., Chen, Y.R., & Xin, K. (2004). Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science, 15: 200-209.
4. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 425-445.
5. Tyler and Lind (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25: 115-191.
6. Bies (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 289-319.
7.  Konovsky (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26: 489-511.
8. Gardner, D. G., Pierce, J. L., & Peng, H. (2021). Social exchange and psychological ownership as complementary pathways from psychological contract fulfillment to organizational citizenship behaviors. Personnel Review, 50(6), 1479-1494.

-----

【L. Organizational Conflicts, Institution and Legitimacy】

1. Kostova, T., Beugelsdijk, S., Scott, W.R. et al. The construct of institutional distance through the lens of different institutional perspectives: Review, analysis, and recommendations. J Int Bus Stud 51, 467–497 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00294-w
2. Tatiana Kostova and Srilata Zaheer, 1999. Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise. Academy of Management Review, January 1, 1999 vol. 24 no. 1 64-81.
3. Morris, Williams and Leung (1998). Conflict management style: accounting for Cross-National difference. Journal of International Studies, 29: 729-748.
4. Xie, Song and Stringfellow (1998). Interfunctional conflict, conflict resolution styles, and new product success: A four-culture comparison. Management Science, 44: 192-206.
5. Markus and Lin (1999). Conflict ways: Cultural diversity in the management and practices of conflict. Culture Divides, 302-333.

-----

【M. The Locality and Generalization of Culture】
1. Schwartz (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advance and empirical tests in 20 centuries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25: 1-65.
2. Morris, Leung, Ames and Lickel (1999). Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgement. Academy of Management Review, 24: 781-796.
3. Vergara-Perucich, J. F., & Aguirre-Nuñez, C. (2023). Culturality index of Chile: A methodological approach to cultural materialism. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(1).

-----

【N. Local Study vs. Cross-Culture Study】
1. Yang (2000). Monocultural and cross-culture indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3: 241-263.
2. Bond and Smith (1996). Cross-culture social and organizational psychology. Annual Review, 47: 205-235.

-----

【O. Psychological Ownership】
1. Jon L. Pierce, Tatiana Kostova and Kurt T. Dirks. Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations, Academy of Management Review, April 1, 2001 vol. 26 no. 2 298-310.
2. Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635.
3. Vora, D., & Kostova, T. (2020). Antecedents of psychological attachment in multinational enterprises. Multinational Business Review, 28(1), 87-107.

-----

【P. International HRM (Knowledge Transfer)】
1. Tatiana Kostova, 1999, Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective. Academy of Management Review, April 1, 1999 vol. 24 no. 2: 308-324.
2. Tatiana Kostova and Kendall Roth. Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects.  Academy of Management Journal, February 1, 2002 vol. 45 no. 1 215-233.
3. Fortwengel, J., & Kostova, T. (2023). Three decades of research on practice transfer in multinational firms: Past contributions and future opportunities. Journal of World Business, 58(3), 101430.
4. Mougin, J., Boujut, J. F., Pourroy, F., & Poussier, G. (2015). Modelling knowledge transfer: A knowledge dynamics perspective. Concurrent engineering, 23(4), 308-319.

-----

【Q. Social Capital 】
1. Tatiana Kostova and Kendall Roth, Social Capital in Multinational Corporations and a Micro-Macro Model of its Formation. Academy of Management Review, April 1, 2003 vol. 28 no. 2 297-317.
2. DeSantola, A., Zhelyazkov, P. I., & Hallen, B. L. (2024). Windows versus waves of opportunity: How reputation alters venture capital firms' resource mobilization. Strategic Management Journal, 45(2), 301-332.
3. Arslan, B., Vasudeva, G., & Hirsch, E. B. (2024). Public–private and private–private collaboration as pathways for socially beneficial innovation: Evidence from antimicrobial drug-development tasks. Academy of Management Journal, 67(2), 554-582.

-----

【R. Innovation】

1.	Erwin Danneels and Alex Vestal, 2020. Normalizing vs. analyzing: Drawing the lessons from failure to enhance firm innovativeness, Journal of Business Venturing, Volume 35, Issue 1, 105903, ISSN 0883-9026.
2.	Arslan, B., Vasudeva, G., & Hirsch, E. B. (2024). Public–private and private–private collaboration as pathways for socially beneficial innovation: Evidence from antimicrobial drug-development tasks. Academy of Management Journal, 67(2), 554-582.
學年

學期

開課號

課號

課程名稱

英文課名

學院

開課系所

班級

任課教師

學分

授課時數

授課類型

課程類別

修別

排課時間

排課地點

全英語授課

任課教師電子郵件信箱

核心能力

職涯類別

SDGs連結

教學內涵

一、課程目標Course objectives

二、師生晤談時間及地點Instructor office hours

時間

地點

電話

三、授課方式Teaching approach

四、評量方式Grading criteria:

七、彈性教學

八、TA協助事項Teaching Assistant tasks

九、備註Remarks

十、本課程可培養學生之核心能力與教學活動、核心能力與評量方法之對應表
